Future
Possibilities
When
you were young, you too no doubt asked those Great Big Impossible
Questions About Life like `What's it all about? Why are we here? What
are we supposed to do? Chances are you either grew out of asking them
as a part of coping with Life in the Here and Now, or you tried to
cheat and `look up the answers in the back of the book' by subscribing
to a religion or some other belief system. A few of us however never
stopped. We either became scientists or, for those of us who couldn't
handle the math, philosophers and science fiction writers.
Future Possibilities
revisits those questions in a short, simple, straightfoward way. It is
grounded securely in science and, like science, does not attempt to
create yet another belief system. It's also rather fun, especially for
those you who have discovered that the best way to cope with Life as We
Know It is with a sense of humour and nerves of steel.
|
Present
Probabilities
Humans
are such emotional creatures. Most can’t help using words like `dry’,
`nihilistic’, even `sterile’ when they encounter succinctly-stated
theories as to the nature of reality that science and science-based
philosophy can provide. Present
Probabilities
would for them be a classic example. They cannot live without some
notion of Purpose, or Point to it All. There has to be a `God’ of some
kind, whether it derives from one of the many pre-packaged religions or
equally numerous pseudo-sciences like astrology or witchcraft.
Science
of course is entirely neutral on the subject. It only suggests that
religion ought not deny evidence-based scientific theories which,
though always provisional, can be accepted as `true’ in most practical
circumstances. `Evolution’ is the classic example here. Could a
religion be designed which actually incorporates the philosophy behind
all science, yet satisfy that emotional need for `God’? Plenty have
tried, including one that has to remain nameless because of its
unfortunate propensity for pursuing lawsuits against its critics. Present Probabilities
looks at why such belief systems, and systems expressly designed to
avoid belief, like science, are fundamentally incompatible. |
Past Certainties
Science
not only admits that it can't provide answers to Vital
Questions like `How did Reality begin?', `What is the purpose of
life?'; it also explains why it can't answer them. Many folk want those
answers all the same however, so they turn to ancient `supernatural'
ones because they have that patina of age and the feeling of
`certainty' that goes with that. Unfortunately some of these people
then go on to claim that supernatural `laws' are somehow above those of
science and should replace it.
There is little point
in attempting to challenge such beliefs, any more
than there is in trying to part an alcoholic from his booze. Only he
(or she) can do that. In any case, ancient beliefs are
interesting; they give us an insight into what the world was like
before the advent of science. But rather than attempt to review these
beliefs here, it seems best to let the many websites devoted to them do
so instead. Past Certainties
therefore consists mostly of links to those websites, categorized under
their relevant headings. They should perhaps be approached with the
same caution as pornography - you might be seduced by the beliefs they
represent and want to join in. That's the risk of choice; it's up to
you. |
Future Realities
| Future
Realities
is a complete web-site in itself. It contains three
science fiction novels, one work of `fictional science', plus an essay
`written' by one of the characters in one of the novels. The primary
theme of all of these works is `artificial consciousness'. As perhaps
with TTTM
Religion
itself, some knowledge of science is helpful for
appreciating them. This may make them a little more challenging to
read; they cannot therefore be to everybody's taste. Although they can
be read independently of each other, you may like to try Deus
Ex Machina 1949 first, since it
establishes the `universe' in which all the others are set. |
|